vs
6.2Battery4.8
2.8Build & features4.8
Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than EAH-AZ40?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · EAH-AZ40: No
- Battery life9 h vs 7.5 h+20%
- Highest frequency48,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2.4×
- aptXYes · EAH-AZ40: No
- Driver size11 mm vs 6 mm+83%
Why is EAH-AZ40 better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?
- Earbud weight (each)7.8 g vs 5 g+56%
- Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 11 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 48,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 7.5 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.8 g | 5 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSennheiser RS 52006.25.9
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T6.16.2vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsJBL Live Pro+ TWS6.26.1
vs
Technics EAH-AZ80vsTechnics EAH-AZ405.04.9