vs
6.2Battery5.0
Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1?
- Battery life9 h vs 7 h+29%
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1: No
- Highest frequency48,000 Hz vs 21,000 Hz2.3×
- Driver size11 mm vs 7 mm+57%
- Earbud weight (each)7.8 g vs 12 g+54%
Why is CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1 better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
- Charging time2.5 h vs 1.5 h+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 11 mm | 7 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 48,000 Hz | 21,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 107 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | — |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 7 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.8 g | 12 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSennheiser RS 52006.25.9
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T6.16.2vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsJBL Live Pro+ TWS6.26.1
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1
vsSony WF-XB700vsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1