JVC WOOD HA-FW1000T vs Sony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800

What WOOD HA-FW1000T does better (5) and where h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

6.0Score

5 advantages≈ $120

Higher score

2 advantages≈ $120

6.1Battery6.1

Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800?

Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800: No
Battery life9 h vs 8 h+12%
aptXYes · h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800: No
Driver size11 mm vs 6 mm+83%
Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%

Specifications

Only differences	JVC WOOD HA-FW1000T≈ $1206.0	Sony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800≈ $120
Sound
Fit	In-ear	In-ear
Ear cup design	Closed-back	Closed-back
Driver type	Dynamic	Dynamic
Driver size	11 mm	6 mm
Lowest frequency	20 Hz	—
Highest frequency	48,000 Hz	—
Hi-Res Audio	Yes	—
Adjustable equaliser	—	Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling	Yes	—
Transparency / ambient mode	Yes	—
Battery & charging
Battery life	9 h	8 h
Charging time	2.5 h	1.5 h
Connectivity
Wireless	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth version	5.2	5
Bluetooth codecs	aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC	AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)	Yes	No
aptX	Yes	No
LDAC	No	No
NFC pairing	—	Yes
USB-C	—	Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)	7.8 g	7.6 g
Protection rating	IPX4	—
Water resistance (IPx)	IPx4	—
Features
Touch controls	Yes	—
Hands-free calls	Yes	Yes