vs
7.2Noise control & calls3.1
6.2Battery8.2
Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than RS 5200?
- Active noise cancellingYes · RS 5200: No
- Highest frequency48,000 Hz vs 16,000 Hz3×
- Charging time2.5 h vs 3 h+20%
Why is RS 5200 better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?
- Battery life9 h vs 12 h+33%
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 15 Hz+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 11 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 15 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 48,000 Hz | 16,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | No |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 12 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 3 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | — |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | — | 61 g |
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.8 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T6.16.2vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsJBL Live Pro+ TWS6.26.1vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsSennheiser RS 52006.15.9
vsSoundcore Liberty Air 2 ProvsSennheiser RS 52006.45.9