vs
7.2Noise control & calls9.3
6.1Battery3.2
Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190?
- Battery life9 h vs 6 h+50%
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
Why is Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190 better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx7+75%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | — |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 11 mm | — |
| Number of drivers | — | 1 |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 48,000 Hz | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 6 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 5 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | — |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 5 min → 1 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | — |
| aptX | Yes | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.8 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX7 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx7 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T5.06.0
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds 2 SM-R117vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T6.66.0vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsJBL Live Pro+ TWS6.06.0
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsShure AONIC 215 Gen 2 SE21DYBK+TW2-A5.95.9vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsSoundcore Liberty Air 2 Pro5.96.2