vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
5.3Battery6.2
7.4Build & features2.8
Why is TOUR PRO+ TWS better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
- Lowest frequency10 Hz vs 20 Hz2×
- Charging time2 h vs 2.5 h+25%
- Earbud weight (each)7.5 g vs 7.8 g+4%
Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than TOUR PRO+ TWS?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · TOUR PRO+ TWS: Yes
- Battery life8 h vs 9 h+12%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 48,000 Hz2.4×
- aptXNo · TOUR PRO+ TWS: Yes
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
- Driver size6.8 mm vs 11 mm+62%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6.8 mm | 11 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 10 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 48,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2.5 h |
| Wireless charging (case) | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.5 g | 7.8 g |
| Protection rating | IPX5 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
JBL TOUR PRO+ TWSvsSennheiser CX Plus7.67.4
vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSennheiser RS 52006.25.9
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T6.16.2vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsJBL Live Pro+ TWS6.26.1