vs
9.3Noise control & calls7.2
4.1Battery6.1
6.8Build & features2.8
Why is Reflect Mini NC better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?
- Earbud weight (each)2 g vs 7.8 g3.9×
Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than Reflect Mini NC?
- Battery life7 h vs 9 h+29%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 48,000 Hz2.4×
- Driver size6 mm vs 11 mm+83%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 11 mm |
| Number of drivers | 1 | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 48,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 96 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 6 h | — |
| Charging time | — | 2.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | Yes |
| aptX | — | Yes |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 2 g | 7.8 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
