How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Endurance Race TWS vs WOOD HA-FW1000T

JBL Endurance Race TWS vs JVC WOOD HA-FW1000T

What Endurance Race TWS does better (2) and where WOOD HA-FW1000T wins (3) — every spec side by side.

JBL Endurance Race TWS
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ $70
vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000T
JVC · 2021WOOD HA-FW1000T
6.2Score
3 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
4.8Noise control & calls7.2
7.1Battery6.2

Why is Endurance Race TWS better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?

  1. Battery life10 h vs 9 h+11%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%

Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than Endurance Race TWS?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · Endurance Race TWS: Yes
  2. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 48,000 Hz2.4×
  3. Driver size6 mm vs 11 mm+83%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size6 mm11 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz48,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω—
Sensitivity99 dB—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life10 h9 h
Total with charging case30 h—
Charging time—2.5 h
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.25.2
Bluetooth codecs—aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—Yes
LDAC—No
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—7.8 g
Protection ratingIP67IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx4
Dust protection (IP)6—
ColoursBlack—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare