vs
9.3Noise control & calls7.2
2.5Battery6.2
6.1Build & features2.8
Why is FreeBuds 4 better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?
- Charging time1 h vs 2.5 h2.5×
- Earbud weight (each)4.1 g vs 7.8 g+90%
- Driver size14.3 mm vs 11 mm+30%
Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than FreeBuds 4?
- Battery life4 h vs 9 h2.2×
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · FreeBuds 4: Yes
- aptXNo · FreeBuds 4: Yes
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 48,000 Hz+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | Semi-in-ear (open) | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Open-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 14.3 mm | 11 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 48,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | Yes |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 4 h | 9 h |
| Battery life with ANC | 2.5 h | — |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | Yes |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.1 g | 7.8 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Huawei Freebuds 5vsHuawei FreeBuds 46.15.5
vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSennheiser RS 52006.25.9
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T6.16.2vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsJBL Live Pro+ TWS6.26.1