How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAT1300 vs TAT3509

Philips TAT1300 vs Philips TAT3509

What TAT1300 does better (2) and where TAT3509 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAT1300
Philips · 2026TAT1300
4.1Score
2 advantages≈ $18
vs
Philips TAT3509
Philips · 2024TAT3509
5.9Score
3 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
3.1Noise control & calls7.2
2.7Battery4.7
6.1Build & features5.2

Why is TAT1300 better than TAT3509?

  1. Weight34 g vs 45 g+32%
  2. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%

Why is TAT3509 better than TAT1300?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · TAT1300: Yes
  2. Battery life6 h vs 8 h+33%
  3. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT1300Philips TAT1300≈ $184.1
Philips TAT3509Philips TAT3509≈ $355.9
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance105 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity105 dB104 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h8 h
Battery life with ANC—6 h
Total with charging case—24 h
Charging time3 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.3
Bluetooth codecsSBCLC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight34 g45 g
Protection ratingIPX4IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare