vs
3.1Noise control & calls3.1
Why is TAT1300 better than Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer?
- Bluetooth version6 vs 5+20%
Why is Space Cruiser TWS-Ohrhörer better than TAT1300?
- Battery life6 h vs 30 h5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 10 mm | — |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 105 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 30 h |
| Charging time | 3 h | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | — |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | — |
| aptX | No | — |
| LDAC | No | — |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Google Assistant |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 34 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | — |
| Colours | — | Grey, White |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
