How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. GO SPORT vs TAT3509

JLab GO SPORT vs Philips TAT3509

What GO SPORT does better (2) and where TAT3509 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JLab GO SPORT
JLab · 2024GO SPORT
2 advantages≈ $35
vs
Philips TAT3509
Philips · 2024TAT3509
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ $35
Higher score
6.2Battery4.6

Why is GO SPORT better than TAT3509?

  1. Battery life9 h vs 8 h+12%
  2. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%

Why is TAT3509 better than GO SPORT?

  1. Driver size6 mm vs 10 mm+67%
  2. Charging time2.2 h vs 2 h+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT3509Philips TAT3509≈ $355.9
Sound
Fit—In-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size6 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance16 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity—104 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliserYesYes
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life9 h8 h
Battery life with ANC—6 h
Total with charging case—24 h
Charging time2.2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.3
Bluetooth codecsSBCLC3, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Weight—45 g
Protection ratingIP55IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx4
Dust protection (IP)5—
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare