How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAT1300 vs R50i NC

Philips TAT1300 vs Soundcore R50i NC

What TAT1300 does better (1) and where R50i NC wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAT1300
Philips · 2026TAT1300
4.1Score
1 advantage≈ $18
Higher score
vs
Soundcore R50i NC
Soundcore · 2026R50i NC
1 advantage
3.1Noise control & calls3.1

Why is TAT1300 better than R50i NC?

  1. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.3+13%

Why is R50i NC better than TAT1300?

  1. Battery life6 h vs 10 h+67%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAT1300Philips TAT1300≈ $184.1
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size10 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance105 Ω—
Sensitivity105 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h10 h
Charging time3 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.3
Bluetooth codecsSBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYesYes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Weight34 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IP54
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx4
Dust protection (IP)—5
Colours—Black
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare