How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAH5209 vs HiTune Max5c

Philips TAH5209 vs Ugreen HiTune Max5c

What TAH5209 does better (0) and where HiTune Max5c wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAH5209
Philips · 2024TAH5209
5.2Score
0 advantages≈ $30
vs
Ugreen HiTune Max5c
Ugreen · 2025HiTune Max5c
8.6Score
7 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls8.5
7.5Battery8.3

Why is TAH5209 better than HiTune Max5c?

TAH5209 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is HiTune Max5c better than TAH5209?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · TAH5209: Yes
  2. Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No · TAH5209: Yes
  3. Battery life65 h vs 75 h+15%
  4. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz2×
  5. LDACNo · TAH5209: Yes
  6. Charging time2 h vs 1.5 h+33%
  7. Battery capacity500 mAh vs 600 mAh+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH5209Philips TAH5209≈ $305.2
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity92 dB—
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Microphones—5
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life65 h75 h
Battery life with ANC—45 h
Battery capacity500 mAh600 mAh
Charging time2 h1.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 3 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.35.4
Bluetooth codecsSBCLDAC, AAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoYes
aptXNoNo
LDACNoYes
Multipoint (two devices)YesYes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Weight—260 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare