Why is TAH2000 better than TAH5209?
TAH2000 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAH5209 better than TAH2000?
- Battery life26 h vs 65 h2.5×
- Battery capacity200 mAh vs 500 mAh2.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 123 dB | 92 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 26 h | 65 h |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | 500 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | 15 min → 6 h | 5 min → 3 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | Yes | Yes |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
