How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Junior 320 vs TAH5209

JBL Junior 320 vs Philips TAH5209

What Junior 320 does better (0) and where TAH5209 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

JBL Junior 320
JBL · 2024Junior 320
0 advantages≈ $25
vs
Philips TAH5209
Philips · 2024TAH5209
5.2Score
2 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8

Why is Junior 320 better than TAH5209?

Junior 320 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TAH5209 better than Junior 320?

  1. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
  2. Driver size32 mm vs 40 mm+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips TAH5209Philips TAH5209≈ $305.2
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance34 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity78 dB92 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life—65 h
Battery capacity—500 mAh
Charging time3 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—5 min → 3 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight117 g—
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare