vs
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
7.4Battery7.5
Why is Tune 525BT better than TAH5209?
Tune 525BT has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TAH5209 better than Tune 525BT?
- Battery life57 h vs 65 h+14%
- Driver size33 mm vs 40 mm+21%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Over-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 33 mm | 40 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 30 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 102 dB | 92 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | No |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 57 h | 65 h |
| Battery capacity | — | 500 mAh |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 5 min → 3 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 157 g | — |
| Foldable | Yes | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
