How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAH4500 vs HiTune S3 WS209

Philips TAH4500 vs Ugreen HiTune S3 WS209

What TAH4500 does better (1) and where HiTune S3 WS209 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAH4500
Philips · 2026TAH4500
1 advantage≈ $35
vs
Ugreen HiTune S3 WS209
Ugreen · 2025HiTune S3 WS209
5.1Score
0 advantages≈ $19
Higher score
9.2Noise control & calls9.2

Why is TAH4500 better than HiTune S3 WS209?

  1. Bluetooth version6 vs 5.4+11%

Why is HiTune S3 WS209 better than TAH4500?

HiTune S3 WS209 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—12 mm
Sensitivity113 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life—7 h
Battery capacity500 mAh—
Charging time—3 h
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version65.4
Bluetooth codecs—AAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-C—Yes
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Voice assistantGoogle Assistant, Siri—
Design & build
Protection rating—IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare