vs
3.8Noise control & calls9.2
Why is Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth Headphones better than HiTune S3 WS209?
Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth Headphones has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is HiTune S3 WS209 better than Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth Headphones?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth Headphones: Yes
- Bluetooth version5 vs 5.4+8%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | On-ear | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 105 dB | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | — | 7 h |
| Charging time | — | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 15 min → 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Protection rating | — | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Philips TAH2000vsLazerbuilt Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth Headphones
vsPhilips TAK2000vsLazerbuilt Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth Headphonesvs
Lazerbuilt Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth HeadphonesvsPhilips Century TAH2000vs
Lazerbuilt Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth HeadphonesvsBelkin SoundForm Mini 2 Wirelessvs
Lazerbuilt Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth HeadphonesvsBaseus Bowie D05vs
Philips TAK2000vsUgreen HiTune S3 WS209