vs
4.0Battery2.6
Why is Century TAH2000 better than HiTune S3 WS209?
- Battery life26 h vs 7 h3.7×
- Driver size40 mm vs 12 mm3.3×
- Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
Why is HiTune S3 WS209 better than Century TAH2000?
HiTune S3 WS209 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | — | Open-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 40 mm | 12 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | — |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 123 dB | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 26 h | 7 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 3 h |
| Quick charge (claimed) | — | 15 min → 2 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth codecs | SBC | AAC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Low-latency game mode | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Weight | 80 g | — |
| Protection rating | — | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Belkin SoundForm Mini 2 WirelessvsPhilips Century TAH2000
vsPhilips TAK2000vsPhilips Century TAH2000
vsLazerbuilt Squishmallows Plush Bluetooth HeadphonesvsPhilips Century TAH2000vs
Philips Century TAH2000vsBaseus Bowie D05vs
Philips Century TAH2000vsEdifier ES850NBvs
Philips Century TAH2000vsEdifier W80