How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAK2000 vs HiTune S3 WS209

Philips TAK2000 vs Ugreen HiTune S3 WS209

What TAK2000 does better (1) and where HiTune S3 WS209 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAK2000
Philips · 2025TAK2000
1 advantage≈ $18
vs
Ugreen HiTune S3 WS209
Ugreen · 2025HiTune S3 WS209
5.1Score
1 advantage≈ $19
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls9.2

Why is TAK2000 better than HiTune S3 WS209?

  1. Driver size32 mm vs 12 mm2.7×

Why is HiTune S3 WS209 better than TAK2000?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · TAK2000: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size32 mm12 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance32 Ω—
Sensitivity112 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Battery & charging
Battery life—7 h
Charging time—3 h
Quick charge (claimed)—15 min → 2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth version—5.4
Bluetooth codecs—AAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Design & build
Weight135 g—
Protection rating—IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
FoldableYes—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare