How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. RZ-S30W vs TAST702BK/98

Panasonic RZ-S30W vs Philips TAST702BK/98

What RZ-S30W does better (1) and where TAST702BK/98 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Panasonic RZ-S30W
Panasonic · 2020RZ-S30W
5.2Score
1 advantage≈ $45
Higher score
vs
Philips TAST702BK/98
Philips · 2020TAST702BK/98
1 advantage≈ $35
4.7Battery3.0

Why is RZ-S30W better than TAST702BK/98?

  1. Battery life7.5 h vs 6 h+25%

Why is TAST702BK/98 better than RZ-S30W?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx4 vs IPx5+25%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamic—
Driver size6 mm6 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—16 Ω
Sensitivity—94 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life7.5 h6 h
Charging time2 h2 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCAAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
USB-CYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)4 g—
Protection ratingIPX4IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)IPx4IPx5
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare