How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. TAST702BK/98 vs Redmi Buds 3 Pro

Philips TAST702BK/98 vs Xiaomi Redmi Buds 3 Pro

What TAST702BK/98 does better (2) and where Redmi Buds 3 Pro wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips TAST702BK/98
Philips · 2020TAST702BK/98
2 advantages≈ $35
vs
Xiaomi Redmi Buds 3 Pro
Xiaomi · 2021Redmi Buds 3 Pro
5.1Score
1 advantage≈ $30
Higher score
3.0Battery2.8

Why is TAST702BK/98 better than Redmi Buds 3 Pro?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%
  2. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%

Why is Redmi Buds 3 Pro better than TAST702BK/98?

  1. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.2+4%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size6 mm—
Lowest frequency20 Hz—
Highest frequency20,000 Hz—
Impedance16 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity94 dB—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h6 h
Total with charging case—28 h
Battery capacity—35 mAh
Charging time2 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.2
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—4.9 g
Protection ratingIPX5IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx5IPx4
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare