vs
7.0Battery3.0
Why is TE-D01gs better than TAST702BK/98?
- Battery life10 h vs 6 h+67%
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx5+40%
- aptXYes · TAST702BK/98: No
Why is TAST702BK/98 better than TE-D01gs?
TAST702BK/98 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | — |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 94 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | — |
| Noise control | ||
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 6 h |
| Battery capacity | 50 mAh | — |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.6 g | — |
| Protection rating | IPX7 | IPX5 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx5 |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
