How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. 105 AER vs AONIC 50 GEN 2

Meze 105 AER vs Shure AONIC 50 GEN 2

What 105 AER does better (2) and where AONIC 50 GEN 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Meze 105 AER
Meze · 2024105 AER
2 advantages≈ $320
vs
Shure AONIC 50 GEN 2
Shure · 2023AONIC 50 GEN 2
8.2Score
1 advantage≈ $340
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls7.8

Why is 105 AER better than AONIC 50 GEN 2?

  1. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
  2. Highest frequency30,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+36%

Why is AONIC 50 GEN 2 better than 105 AER?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · 105 AER: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Meze 105 AERMeze 105 AER≈ $320
Sound
FitOver-ear—
Ear cup designOpen-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size50 mm50 mm
Lowest frequency5 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency30,000 Hz22,000 Hz
Impedance42 Ω39 Ω
Sensitivity112 dB98 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—45 h
Charging time3 h—
Connectivity
WirelessNoYes
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX HD, aptX, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—Yes
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight336 g334 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare