How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. MONITOR III A.N.C. vs 105 AER

Marshall MONITOR III A.N.C. vs Meze 105 AER

What MONITOR III A.N.C. does better (3) and where 105 AER wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Marshall MONITOR III A.N.C.
Marshall · 2024MONITOR III A.N.C.
8.9Score
3 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Meze 105 AER
Meze · 2024105 AER
3 advantages≈ $320
7.8Noise control & calls3.8

Why is MONITOR III A.N.C. better than 105 AER?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · 105 AER: No
  2. Weight250 g vs 336 g+34%
  3. Charging time2.5 h vs 3 h+20%

Why is 105 AER better than MONITOR III A.N.C.?

  1. Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
  2. Driver size32 mm vs 50 mm+56%
  3. Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 30,000 Hz+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Meze 105 AERMeze 105 AER≈ $320
Sound
Fit—Over-ear
Ear cup design—Open-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size32 mm50 mm
Lowest frequency20 Hz5 Hz
Highest frequency20,000 Hz30,000 Hz
Impedance35 Ω42 Ω
Sensitivity—112 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life100 h—
Battery life with ANC70 h—
Charging time2.5 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5.3—
Bluetooth codecsLC3, AAC, SBC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)No—
aptXNo—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
LE AudioYes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight250 g336 g
FoldableYes—
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare