How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OnTrac vs 105 AER

Dyson OnTrac vs Meze 105 AER

What OnTrac does better (1) and where 105 AER wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Dyson OnTrac
Dyson · 2024OnTrac
8.4Score
1 advantage≈ $320
Higher score
vs
Meze 105 AER
Meze · 2024105 AER
2 advantages≈ $320
7.8Noise control & calls3.8

Why is OnTrac better than 105 AER?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · 105 AER: No

Why is 105 AER better than OnTrac?

  1. Highest frequency21,000 Hz vs 30,000 Hz+43%
  2. Lowest frequency6 Hz vs 5 Hz+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Dyson OnTracDyson OnTrac≈ $3208.4
Meze 105 AERMeze 105 AER≈ $320
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—50 mm
Lowest frequency6 Hz5 Hz
Highest frequency21,000 Hz30,000 Hz
Impedance—42 Ω
Sensitivity—112 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life55 h—
Battery life with ANC55 h—
Charging time3 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight—336 g
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare