How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Aventho 300 vs 105 AER

beyerdynamic Aventho 300 vs Meze 105 AER

What Aventho 300 does better (3) and where 105 AER wins (2) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Aventho 300
beyerdynamic · 2024Aventho 300
8.3Score
3 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
vs
Meze 105 AER
Meze · 2024105 AER
2 advantages≈ $320
6.4Noise control & calls3.8

Why is Aventho 300 better than 105 AER?

  1. Active noise cancellingYes · 105 AER: No
  2. Weight319 g vs 336 g+5%
  3. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%

Why is 105 AER better than Aventho 300?

  1. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 30,000 Hz+36%
  2. Driver size45 mm vs 50 mm+11%
Specifications

Side by side

Meze 105 AERMeze 105 AER≈ $320
Sound
FitOver-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm50 mm
Lowest frequency5 Hz5 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz30,000 Hz
Impedance—42 Ω
Sensitivity—112 dB
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesNo
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h—
Battery life with ANC50 h—
Charging time2 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesNo
Bluetooth version5.4—
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXYes—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight319 g336 g
FoldableYes—
Colours—Black
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare