vs
7.2Noise control & calls7.2
6.1Battery5.0
2.8Build & features3.1
Why is WOOD HA-FW1000T better than EAH-AZ70W?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · EAH-AZ70W: No
- Battery life9 h vs 7.5 h+20%
- Highest frequency48,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2.4×
- aptXYes · EAH-AZ70W: No
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
- Driver size11 mm vs 10 mm+10%
Why is EAH-AZ70W better than WOOD HA-FW1000T?
- Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
- Earbud weight (each)7.8 g vs 7 g+11%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 11 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 48,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 9 h | 7.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 6.5 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.8 g | 7 g |
| Protection rating | IPX4 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T5.06.0
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds 2 SM-R117vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T6.66.0
vsSamsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000T5.96.0vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsJBL Live Pro+ TWS6.06.0vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsTechnics EAH-AZ70W5.95.6