How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190 vs EAH-AZ70W

Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190 vs Technics EAH-AZ70W

What Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190 does better (1) and where EAH-AZ70W wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190
5.9Score
1 advantage≈ $150
Higher score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ70W
Technics · 2020EAH-AZ70W
5.6Score
2 advantages≈ $160
9.3Noise control & calls7.2
3.2Battery5.0

Why is Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190 better than EAH-AZ70W?

  1. Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%

Why is EAH-AZ70W better than Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190?

  1. Battery life6 h vs 7.5 h+25%
  2. Battery life with ANC5 h vs 6.5 h+30%
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size—10 mm
Number of drivers1—
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life6 h7.5 h
Battery life with ANC5 h6.5 h
Charging time—2 h
Quick charge (claimed)5 min → 1 h—
Fast charging supportYes—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
USB-C—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion appYes—
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)—7 g
Protection ratingIPX7IPX4
Water resistance (IPx)IPx7IPx4
Features
Touch controlsYesYes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare