vs
2.6Battery5.0
Why is Elite Active 75t better than CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1?
- Earbud weight (each)5.5 g vs 12 g2.2×
Why is CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1 better than Elite Active 75t?
- Battery life5 h vs 7 h+40%
- Lowest frequency20 Hz vs 5 Hz4×
- aptXNo · Elite Active 75t: Yes
- Charging time2.5 h vs 1.5 h+67%
- Driver size6 mm vs 7 mm+17%
- Highest frequency20,000 Hz vs 21,000 Hz+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 7 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 5 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 21,000 Hz |
| Sensitivity | — | 107 dB |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 7 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 1.5 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | aptX, AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | Yes |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.5 g | 12 g |
| Protection rating | IP57 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | — |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | — |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Jabra Elite Active 75tvsSony WF-XB7005.35.0vs
Jabra Elite Active 75tvsTechnics EAH-AZ70W5.35.7vs
Jabra Elite Active 75tvsFiiO FW1 FIO-FW1
vsXiaomi Redmi Buds 3 ProvsJabra Elite Active 75t5.25.3
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1
vsJVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSennheiser CX 400BT True Wireless CX400TW1