vs
4.2Noise control & calls7.2
2.6Battery5.0
9.5Build & features3.1
Why is Elite Active 75t better than EAH-AZ70W?
- Water resistance (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
- Earbud weight (each)5.5 g vs 7 g+27%
Why is EAH-AZ70W better than Elite Active 75t?
- Active noise cancellingNo · Elite Active 75t: Yes
- Battery life5 h vs 7.5 h+50%
- Driver size6 mm vs 10 mm+67%
- Charging time2.5 h vs 2 h+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Noise reduction for calls | Yes | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 5 h | 7.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 6.5 h |
| Charging time | 2.5 h | 2 h |
| Fast charging support | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri | — |
| Companion app | Yes | — |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 5.5 g | 7 g |
| Protection rating | IP57 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx7 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Jabra Elite Active 75tvsYamaha TW-E3B5.36.0vs
Jabra Elite Active 75tvsSony WF-XB7005.34.9vs
Jabra Elite Active 75tvsAudio Technica ATH-SQ1TW5.34.6vs
Jabra Elite Active 75tvsSamsung Galaxy Buds Live SM-R180vs
Jabra Elite Active 75tvsFiiO FW1 FIO-FW1
vs
Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro SM-R190vsTechnics EAH-AZ70W5.95.6