vs
4.1Battery2.6
Why is FW1 FIO-FW1 better than Elite Active 75t?
- Battery life7 h vs 5 h+40%
- aptXYes · Elite Active 75t: No
- Earbud weight (each)4.3 g vs 5.5 g+28%
- Charging time2 h vs 2.5 h+25%
Why is Elite Active 75t better than FW1 FIO-FW1?
Elite Active 75t has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Balanced armature | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 6 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 20,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | No |
| Noise reduction for calls | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 7 h | 5 h |
| Charging time | 2 h | 2.5 h |
| Fast charging support | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX, AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| Multipoint (two devices) | — | Yes |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Voice assistant | — | Alexa, Google Assistant, Siri |
| Companion app | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 4.3 g | 5.5 g |
| Protection rating | — | IP57 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx7 |
| Dust protection (IP) | — | 5 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | — |
