How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. BTH12 vs TAH5209

iClever BTH12 vs Philips TAH5209

What BTH12 does better (1) and where TAH5209 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

iClever BTH12
iClever · 2022BTH12
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ $30
vs
Philips TAH5209
Philips · 2024TAH5209
5.2Score
2 advantages≈ $30
Higher score
3.8Noise control & calls3.8
5.8Battery7.5

Why is BTH12 better than TAH5209?

  1. Battery capacity800 mAh vs 500 mAh+60%

Why is TAH5209 better than BTH12?

  1. Battery life40 h vs 65 h+62%
  2. Bluetooth version5 vs 5.3+6%
Specifications

Side by side

iClever BTH12iClever BTH12≈ $304.4
Philips TAH5209Philips TAH5209≈ $305.2
Sound
Fit—Over-ear
Ear cup design—Closed-back
Driver type—Dynamic
Driver size40 mm40 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—92 dB
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoNo
Battery & charging
Battery life40 h65 h
Battery capacity800 mAh500 mAh
Charging time—2 h
Quick charge (claimed)10 min → 4 h5 min → 3 h
Fast charging supportYesYes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55.3
Bluetooth codecs—SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-CYesYes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare