Why is ED-NBDS better than EAH-AZ70W?
- Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes · EAH-AZ70W: No
- Highest frequency40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz2×
- Charging time1 h vs 2 h2×
- aptXYes · EAH-AZ70W: No
- Bluetooth version5.2 vs 5+4%
- Earbud weight (each)6 g vs 7 g+17%
Why is EAH-AZ70W better than ED-NBDS?
- Battery life6 h vs 7.5 h+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | — | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Hybrid | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 10 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | 40,000 Hz | 20,000 Hz |
| Impedance | 24 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 92 dB | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | Yes | — |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | Yes | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | Yes | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 6 h | 7.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 6.5 h |
| Charging time | 1 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | aptX Adaptive, aptX, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | Yes | No |
| aptX | Yes | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 6 g | 7 g |
| Protection rating | IP54 | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx4 | IPx4 |
| Dust protection (IP) | 5 | — |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | Yes | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
