vs
6.1Battery5.0
Why is h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 better than EAH-AZ70W?
- Battery life8 h vs 7.5 h+7%
- Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
Why is EAH-AZ70W better than h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800?
- Driver size6 mm vs 10 mm+67%
- Earbud weight (each)7.6 g vs 7 g+9%
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | 6 mm | 10 mm |
| Lowest frequency | — | 20 Hz |
| Highest frequency | — | 20,000 Hz |
| Adjustable equaliser | Yes | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | — | Yes |
| Transparency / ambient mode | — | Yes |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 8 h | 7.5 h |
| Battery life with ANC | — | 6.5 h |
| Charging time | 1.5 h | 2 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | No | No |
| aptX | No | No |
| LDAC | No | No |
| NFC pairing | Yes | — |
| USB-C | Yes | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 7.6 g | 7 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Features | ||
| Touch controls | — | Yes |
| Hands-free calls | Yes | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Apple AirPods ProvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
Apple AirPods (3rd Gen)vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
Google Pixel Buds A-SeriesvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
Sony WF-XB700vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800

