How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OnTrac vs Aionic 50 Gen 2

Dyson OnTrac vs Shure Aionic 50 Gen 2

What OnTrac does better (2) and where Aionic 50 Gen 2 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Dyson OnTrac
Dyson · 2024OnTrac
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
vs
Shure Aionic 50 Gen 2
Shure · 2023Aionic 50 Gen 2
1 advantage≈ $360
7.8Noise control & calls7.8

Why is OnTrac better than Aionic 50 Gen 2?

  1. Battery life55 h vs 45 h+22%
  2. Lowest frequency6 Hz vs 20 Hz3.3×

Why is Aionic 50 Gen 2 better than OnTrac?

  1. Highest frequency21,000 Hz vs 22,000 Hz+5%
Specifications

Side by side

Dyson OnTracDyson OnTrac≈ $3208.4
Sound
FitOn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamic—
Lowest frequency6 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency21,000 Hz22,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life55 h45 h
Battery life with ANC55 h—
Charging time3 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.1
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Colours—Black
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare