How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. Aventho 300 vs OnTrac

beyerdynamic Aventho 300 vs Dyson OnTrac

What Aventho 300 does better (3) and where OnTrac wins (2) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic Aventho 300
beyerdynamic · 2024Aventho 300
8.3Score
3 advantages≈ $300
vs
Dyson OnTrac
Dyson · 2024OnTrac
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
6.4Noise control & calls7.8
6.8Battery7.0

Why is Aventho 300 better than OnTrac?

  1. Charging time2 h vs 3 h+50%
  2. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 6 Hz+20%
  3. Highest frequency22,000 Hz vs 21,000 Hz+5%

Why is OnTrac better than Aventho 300?

  1. Battery life50 h vs 55 h+10%
  2. Battery life with ANC50 h vs 55 h+10%
Specifications

Side by side

Dyson OnTracDyson OnTrac≈ $3208.4
Sound
FitOver-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm—
Lowest frequency5 Hz6 Hz
Highest frequency22,000 Hz21,000 Hz
Hi-Res AudioYes—
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANCYes—
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life50 h55 h
Battery life with ANC50 h55 h
Charging time2 h3 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version5.4—
Bluetooth codecsaptX Lossless, aptX Adaptive, AAC—
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)Yes—
aptXYes—
LDACNo—
Multipoint (two devices)Yes—
USB-CYes—
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Design & build
Weight319 g—
FoldableYes—
Features
Touch controlsYes—
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare