How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OnTrac vs ALCHEM-E

Dyson OnTrac vs Zildjian ALCHEM-E

What OnTrac does better (2) and where ALCHEM-E wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Dyson OnTrac
Dyson · 2024OnTrac
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
vs
Zildjian ALCHEM-E
Zildjian · 2024ALCHEM-E
1 advantage≈ $360
7.8Noise control & calls9.2

Why is OnTrac better than ALCHEM-E?

  1. Battery life55 h vs 45 h+22%
  2. Lowest frequency6 Hz vs 8 Hz+33%

Why is ALCHEM-E better than OnTrac?

  1. Highest frequency21,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+90%
Specifications

Side by side

Dyson OnTracDyson OnTrac≈ $3208.4
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency6 Hz8 Hz
Highest frequency21,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYes—
Battery & charging
Battery life55 h45 h
Battery life with ANC55 h—
Charging time3 h—
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare