How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OnTrac vs MONITOR III A.N.C.

Dyson OnTrac vs Marshall MONITOR III A.N.C.

What OnTrac does better (2) and where MONITOR III A.N.C. wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Dyson OnTrac
Dyson · 2024OnTrac
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $320
vs
Marshall MONITOR III A.N.C.
Marshall · 2024MONITOR III A.N.C.
8.9Score
3 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
7.8Noise control & calls7.8
7.0Battery9.6

Why is OnTrac better than MONITOR III A.N.C.?

  1. Lowest frequency6 Hz vs 20 Hz3.3×
  2. Highest frequency21,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+5%

Why is MONITOR III A.N.C. better than OnTrac?

  1. Battery life55 h vs 100 h+82%
  2. Battery life with ANC55 h vs 70 h+27%
  3. Charging time3 h vs 2.5 h+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Dyson OnTracDyson OnTrac≈ $3208.4
Sound
FitOn-ear—
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—32 mm
Lowest frequency6 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency21,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance—35 Ω
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Battery & charging
Battery life55 h100 h
Battery life with ANC55 h70 h
Charging time3 h2.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
Bluetooth codecs—LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Design & build
Weight—250 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare