How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OnTrac vs TOUR ONE M3 SMART TX

Dyson OnTrac vs JBL TOUR ONE M3 SMART TX

What OnTrac does better (2) and where TOUR ONE M3 SMART TX wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Dyson OnTrac
Dyson · 2024OnTrac
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
vs
JBL TOUR ONE M3 SMART TX
7.9Score
3 advantages≈ $330
7.9Noise control & calls6.9
7.1Battery7.4

Why is OnTrac better than TOUR ONE M3 SMART TX?

  1. Battery life with ANC55 h vs 40 h+38%
  2. Lowest frequency6 Hz vs 10 Hz+67%

Why is TOUR ONE M3 SMART TX better than OnTrac?

  1. Battery life55 h vs 70 h+27%
  2. Highest frequency21,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+90%
  3. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Dyson OnTracDyson OnTrac≈ $3208.4
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency6 Hz10 Hz
Highest frequency21,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance—18 Ω
Sensitivity—122 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Head tracking—Yes
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—8
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life55 h70 h
Battery life with ANC55 h40 h
Charging time3 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—5 min → 1 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—278 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare