How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. OnTrac vs Tour One M3

Dyson OnTrac vs JBL Tour One M3

What OnTrac does better (2) and where Tour One M3 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Dyson OnTrac
Dyson · 2024OnTrac
8.4Score
2 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
vs
JBL Tour One M3
JBL · 2025Tour One M3
7.9Score
3 advantages≈ $270
7.8Noise control & calls6.7
7.0Battery7.6

Why is OnTrac better than Tour One M3?

  1. Battery life with ANC55 h vs 40 h+38%
  2. Lowest frequency6 Hz vs 10 Hz+67%

Why is Tour One M3 better than OnTrac?

  1. Battery life55 h vs 70 h+27%
  2. Highest frequency21,000 Hz vs 40,000 Hz+90%
  3. Charging time3 h vs 2 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Dyson OnTracDyson OnTrac≈ $3208.4
JBL Tour One M3JBL Tour One M3≈ $2707.9
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size—40 mm
Lowest frequency6 Hz10 Hz
Highest frequency21,000 Hz40,000 Hz
Impedance—18 Ω
Sensitivity—122 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Head tracking—Yes
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingYesYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient modeYesYes
Microphones—8
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life55 h70 h
Battery life with ANC55 h40 h
Charging time3 h2 h
Quick charge (claimed)—5 min → 1 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.3
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUX—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—278 g
Foldable—Yes
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare