vs
6.8Battery6.2
Why is Sleepbuds II better than h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800?
- Battery life10 h vs 8 h+25%
- Earbud weight (each)2.3 g vs 7.6 g3.3×
Why is h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 better than Sleepbuds II?
- Charging time6 h vs 1.5 h4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 6 mm |
| Adjustable equaliser | — | Yes |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 8 h |
| Charging time | 6 h | 1.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| NFC pairing | — | Yes |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 2.3 g | 7.6 g |
| Colours | White | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
Related comparisons
vs
Sony WF-XB700vsBose Sleepbuds II5.05.0
vs
FiiO FW1 FIO-FW1vsBose Sleepbuds II
vs
Apple AirPods 3vsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
Apple AirPods ProvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
JVC WOOD HA-FW1000TvsSony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
vs
Sony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800vsTechnics EAH-AZ70W
