vs
6.8Battery6.2
Why is Sleepbuds II better than WF-XB700?
- Battery life10 h vs 9 h+11%
- Earbud weight (each)2.3 g vs 8 g3.5×
Why is WF-XB700 better than Sleepbuds II?
- Charging time6 h vs 2.5 h2.4×
Specifications
Side by side
| Sound | ||
| Fit | In-ear | In-ear |
| Ear cup design | Closed-back | Closed-back |
| Driver type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver size | — | 12 mm |
| Noise control | ||
| Active noise cancelling | No | — |
| Battery & charging | ||
| Battery life | 10 h | 9 h |
| Charging time | 6 h | 2.5 h |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth codecs | — | AAC, SBC |
| Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC) | — | No |
| aptX | — | No |
| LDAC | — | No |
| USB-C | — | Yes |
| Design & build | ||
| Earbud weight (each) | 2.3 g | 8 g |
| Protection rating | — | IPX4 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx4 |
| Colours | White | — |
| Features | ||
| Hands-free calls | — | Yes |
