How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen vs WH-CH735N

beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen vs Sony WH-CH735N

What DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen does better (4) and where WH-CH735N wins (1) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen
4 advantages≈ $130
vs
Sony WH-CH735N
Sony · 2026WH-CH735N
7.0Score
1 advantage≈ $110
Higher score
3.9Noise control & calls6.3

Why is DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen better than WH-CH735N?

  1. Charging time1.5 h vs 3 h2×
  2. Driver size45 mm vs 30 mm+50%
  3. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 6 Hz+20%
  4. Highest frequency24,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+20%

Why is WH-CH735N better than DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sony WH-CH735NSony WH-CH735N≈ $1107.0
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm30 mm
Number of drivers3—
Lowest frequency5 Hz6 Hz
Highest frequency24,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance45 Ω100 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB108 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones—2
Battery & charging
Battery life—75 h
Battery life with ANC—50 h
Battery capacity125 mAh—
Charging time1.5 h3 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth codecs—LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight—207 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare