How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen vs Live 780NC

beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen vs JBL Live 780NC

What DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen does better (5) and where Live 780NC wins (1) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen
5 advantages≈ $130
vs
JBL Live 780NC
JBL · 2026Live 780NC
6.7Score
1 advantage≈ $140
Higher score
3.9Noise control & calls7.9

Why is DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen better than Live 780NC?

  1. Battery capacity125 mAh vs 22 mAh5.7×
  2. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 10 Hz2×
  3. Charging time1.5 h vs 2.5 h+67%
  4. Highest frequency24,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+20%
  5. Driver size45 mm vs 40 mm+12%

Why is Live 780NC better than DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

JBL Live 780NCJBL Live 780NC≈ $1406.7
Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm40 mm
Number of drivers3—
Lowest frequency5 Hz10 Hz
Highest frequency24,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance45 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB98 dB
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—22 h
Battery life with ANC—50 h
Battery capacity125 mAh22 mAh
Charging time1.5 h2.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—6
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Design & build
Weight—260 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Touch controls—Yes
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare