How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen vs Milton A.N.C.

beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen vs Marshall Milton A.N.C.

What DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen does better (4) and where Milton A.N.C. wins (1) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen
4 advantages≈ $130
vs
Marshall Milton A.N.C.
Marshall · 2026Milton A.N.C.
7.7Score
1 advantage≈ $170
Higher score
3.9Noise control & calls7.0

Why is DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen better than Milton A.N.C.?

  1. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
  2. Driver size45 mm vs 32 mm+41%
  3. Charging time1.5 h vs 2 h+33%
  4. Highest frequency24,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+20%

Why is Milton A.N.C. better than DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm32 mm
Number of drivers3—
Lowest frequency5 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency24,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance45 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB99 dB
Spatial / 3D audio—Yes
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Adaptive ANC—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones—6
Battery & charging
Battery life—80 h
Battery life with ANC—50 h
Battery capacity125 mAh—
Charging time1.5 h2 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Wireless charging (case)—No
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—6
Bluetooth codecs—LDAC, LC3, AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—No
LDAC—Yes
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
LE Audio—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—200 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare