How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen vs JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS

beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen vs JLab JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS

What DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen does better (4) and where JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS wins (2) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen
4 advantages≈ $130
vs
JLab JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS
5.9Score
2 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
3.9Noise control & calls6.4

Why is DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen better than JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS?

  1. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
  2. Charging time1.5 h vs 2.5 h+67%
  3. Driver size45 mm vs 35 mm+29%
  4. Highest frequency24,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+20%

Why is JBUDS OPEN WIRELESS better than DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen: Yes
  2. Battery capacity125 mAh vs 380 mAh3×
Specifications

Side by side

Sound
FitOn-earOpen-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backOpen-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm35 mm
Number of drivers3—
Lowest frequency5 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency24,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance45 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB94 dB
Adjustable equaliser—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Noise reduction (claimed)—42 dB
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Microphones—2
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—24 h
Battery capacity125 mAh380 mAh
Charging time1.5 h2.5 h
Quick charge (claimed)—10 min → 2.5 h
Fast charging support—Yes
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—6
Bluetooth codecs—AAC, SBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—No
aptX—No
LDAC—No
Multipoint (two devices)—Yes
USB-C—Yes
3.5 mm jack / AUXYesYes
Latency—200 ms
Low-latency game mode—Yes
Smart & streaming
Companion app—Yes
Design & build
Weight—245 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlack—
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare