How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen vs KH-BT04

beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen vs Metz KH-BT04

What DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen does better (3) and where KH-BT04 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

beyerdynamic DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen
3 advantages≈ $130
vs
Metz KH-BT04
Metz · 2026KH-BT04
8.8Score
2 advantages≈ $160
Higher score
4.0Noise control & calls8.6

Why is DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen better than KH-BT04?

  1. Lowest frequency5 Hz vs 20 Hz4×
  2. Highest frequency24,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz+20%
  3. Driver size45 mm vs 40 mm+12%

Why is KH-BT04 better than DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen?

  1. Active noise cancellingNo · DT 275 PRO On-Ear-Monitoring-Kopfhörer, geschlossen: Yes
  2. Battery capacity125 mAh vs 800 mAh6.4×
Specifications

Side by side

Metz KH-BT04Metz KH-BT04≈ $1608.8
Sound
FitOn-earOver-ear
Ear cup designClosed-backClosed-back
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size45 mm40 mm
Number of drivers3—
Lowest frequency5 Hz20 Hz
Highest frequency24,000 Hz20,000 Hz
Impedance45 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity96 dB—
Hi-Res Audio—Yes
Noise control
Active noise cancellingNoYes
Noise reduction for calls—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life—60 h
Battery life with ANC—40 h
Battery capacity125 mAh800 mAh
Charging time1.5 h1.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version—5.4
Bluetooth codecs—aptX HD
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)—Yes
aptX—Yes
LDAC—No
3.5 mm jack / AUXYes—
Design & build
Weight—245 g
Foldable—Yes
ColoursBlackBlack
Features
Hands-free calls—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare