How we scoreBlogAdvertise
Amidioheadphones · speakers · earbuds
  1. Amidio
  2. Compare
  3. h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 vs ETT

Sony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 vs Sudio ETT

What h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 does better (1) and where ETT wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Sony h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800
1 advantage≈ $120
vs
Sudio ETT
Sudio · 2020ETT
7.3Score
2 advantages≈ $90
Higher score
6.2Battery4.0

Why is h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800 better than ETT?

  1. Battery life8 h vs 6 h+33%

Why is ETT better than h.ear in 3 Truly Wireless WF-H800?

  1. Driver size6 mm vs 10 mm+67%
  2. Earbud weight (each)7.6 g vs 5 g+52%
Specifications

Side by side

Sudio ETTSudio ETT≈ $907.3
Sound
FitIn-earIn-ear
Ear cup designClosed-back—
Driver typeDynamicDynamic
Driver size6 mm10 mm
Lowest frequency—20 Hz
Highest frequency—20,000 Hz
Impedance—32 Ω
Sensitivity—98 dB
Adjustable equaliserYes—
Noise control
Active noise cancelling—Yes
Transparency / ambient mode—Yes
Battery & charging
Battery life8 h6 h
Charging time1.5 h1.5 h
Connectivity
WirelessYesYes
Bluetooth version55
Bluetooth codecsAAC, SBCSBC
Hi-res codec (LDAC / aptX HD / LHDC)NoNo
aptXNoNo
LDACNoNo
NFC pairingYes—
USB-CYesYes
Design & build
Earbud weight (each)7.6 g5 g
Protection rating—IPX5
Water resistance (IPx)—IPx5
Features
Hands-free callsYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare